AREDN Update
Update 9/14/21: AREDN N6BRV-QTH node (View Activity) à N6BRV-QTH mesh status (local.mesh) · Updated the Firmware today 9/13/21 to v 3.21.4.0 · Moving the AREDN dish around (still on the window sill) improved the data Rate from 7.5Mbps to ~14.0 to 19.6Mbps (doubled from 9/13/21) · Using my computer to access the internet via the RF 5GHz link to AI6BX-10-RM5-XW-WEST (Sending this Email from Outlook) · Testing WinLink connectivity.
I’ve been told that FCC is taking away some 2.4 and 3.4 GHz and that San Diego county AREDN mesh is undergoing transition to 5.8 GHz There are some AREDN mesh nodes that seem to be active in Southern District. Not sure if they are useful: · N0MIS (RF path through Clairmont Mesa Blvd) à N0MIS-FDCCU150 mesh status (local.mesh) Location: 32.785328 -117.029503 · K6IRF à K6IRF-HARPUSA-HAP-AC mesh status (local.mesh) Location: 34.081260 -117.713862
I believe ARC head quarters has an AREDN on the roof probably talking to Palomar 3.4 GHz node (not sure).
73' N6BRV Nat S.
From: main@ARC2-SDICC.groups.io [mailto:main@ARC2-SDICC.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bruce
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 5:33 PM To: main@ARC2-SDICC.groups.io Subject: Re: [ARC2-SDICC] AREDN a quick report
Thanks Nat For the update on AREDN! This makes me wish I lived on the coast! I am waiting for a usable AREDN signal to my roof in Mira Mesa!! Why can't there be an AREDN node be installed on "Black Mountain" ?? Until then all I have is VARA HF & VHF.
73 Bruce WA6DNT@... WA6DNT@ winlink.org Cell:619-890-0789 Red Cross DST NNC9RC
On 9/13/2021 12:35 PM, Nat 2733E N6BRV wrote:
|
|
Next you should get an IP phone or ATA device to hook up to an analog phone. The Grandstream phones are pretty nice. I have this one: I just ordered one of these: Grandstream HT801 Single-Port Analog Telephone Adapter https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B06XW1BQHC/ To work with this: AT&T 210 Basic Trimline Corded Phone, No AC Power Required, Wall-Mountable, Black ---mark Mark Warrick (949) 870-9493
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 1:34 PM Nat 2733E N6BRV <njsarn9@...> wrote:
|
|